Question 1 |
Which of the following statements is/are TRUE?
MSQ
MSQ
Every subset of a recursively enumerable language is recursive. | |
If a language L and its complement \bar{L} are both recursively enumerable, then L must be recursive. | |
Complement of a context-free language must be recursive. | |
If L_1 and L_2 are regular, then L_1 \cap L_2 must be deterministic context-free. |
Question 1 Explanation:
Question 2 |
Let < M > denote an encoding of an automaton M. Suppose that \Sigma =\{0,1\}. Which of the following languages is/are NOT recursive?
L= \{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is a DFA such that } L(M)=\emptyset \} | |
L= \{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is a DFA such that } L(M)=\Sigma ^ * \} | |
L= \{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is a PDA such that } L(M)=\emptyset \} | |
L= \{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is a PDA such that } L(M)=\Sigma ^ * \} |
Question 2 Explanation:
Question 3 |
The set of all recursively enumerable languages is
closed under complementation | |
closed under intersection. | |
a subset of the set of all recursive languages. | |
an uncountable set |
Question 3 Explanation:
Question 4 |
If L and P are two recursively enumerable languages then they are not closed under
Kleene star L^{*} of L | |
Intersection L \cap P | |
Union L \cup P | |
Set difference |
Question 4 Explanation:
Question 5 |
Given the following statements
S1 : Every context-sensitive language L is recursive
S2 : There exists a recursive language that is not context-sensitive
Which statements are true?
S1 : Every context-sensitive language L is recursive
S2 : There exists a recursive language that is not context-sensitive
Which statements are true?
Only S1 is correct | |
Only S2 is correct | |
Both S1 and S2 are not correct | |
Both S1 and S2 are correct |
Question 5 Explanation:
There are 5 questions to complete.